But finding an answer to the question ‘What is history?’ is a task few feel equipped to Rethinking History. Front Cover. Keith Jenkins. Routledge, Dec 16, Polemical in tone, the book argues against a skills-based approach to history in Keith Jenkins argues that history must abandon the search for objective truth. Re-thinking History has ratings and 35 reviews. Melanie said: History is the written account as perceived by an historian. It is the historian’s ques.
|Published (Last):||14 August 2016|
|PDF File Size:||8.96 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.91 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Views Read Edit View history. Thanks again for this great post. In order to appear plausible any such discourse must normally look simultaneously towards the once real events and situations of the past and towards narrative-type myths common in all social formations.
Re-thinking History – Keith Jenkins – Google Books
The Evolution of Civilizations Carroll Quigley. This means that even a limited epistemology can be aggregated against some norm. That Jenkins occasionally uses an historical methodology to debunk history i. These very much condensed are: Nov 16, Shannon rated it really liked it Shelves: Oct 09, Tavi rated it really liked it. This means that different historians will inevitably ascribe different meaning to the same historical events.
Wholeness and the Implicate Order David Bohm. History means many things to many people.
Lemon, Philosophy of HistoryLondon, David Cannadine, What is History Now? I agree with some of his points, but his tone is arrogant and patronising; good for challenging you and making you think, but not in the way that Jenkins intended it.
That Jenkins’s analysis is contradictory and self-defeating as he himself frequently employs an kith methodology to undermine history Evans, Waites, Mellon, Palladino. The Philosophy of History G. Jenkins retired from the position of professor of historical theory at the University of Chichester in Mar 19, Quincy Kittle rated it it was amazing.
Often it comes down to a discussion of methodology. Sep 26, Greg rated it really liked it. The Road to Serfdom F.
In science we learn more and more about the world around us, but it seems unlikely we will ever have all the answers. No, we are reconstructing a narrative from the available data. Zagorin, in an article in History and Theory 1launched a wholesale attack on the postmodern critique of history, in particular that represented by the articles contained in The Postmodern History Reader 2a collection of articles recently edited by Jenkins.
Though he hisstory too many parentheses in his arguments, the book itself offers an interesting look at historical theory. Keith Jenkins is a British historiographer. Goodreads is the world’s largest site for readers with over 50 million reviews. That does not mean we do not learn useful things from scientific experimentation though perhaps less than we believe. Sep 16, Wes Bishop rated it it was amazing.
An astonishingly bolshy book, and worth reading just for that. At only 84 pages long, this is a very small, slight paperback, but still not really worth the hour or so it took me to read.
So Jenkins is saying that the three blind men cannot have an objective sense of the elephant? That though truths about the past are not absolute, they are yet somehow attainable Appleby, Hunt, Jacob.
Other books in this series. Only wish that the text were longer and the writing clearer in some parts, but still a good read for any student of history or person interested in history, really.
Therefore, history ought to end, and Jenkins desires “the era or the raising of consciousness of the aporia Archaeology of Knowledge Michel Foucault. Keith Jenkins London, Common terms and phrases academic accounts actually answer arguably argued argument Barthes basic bias Blackwell Cambridge centre certaintist concepts constructed context course criticism culture debates developed Discourse of History dominant E.
On the contrary, as he explains in the introduction to At the Limits of Historyin the late s, when he first became acquainted with the postmodern critique of history, he chose merely to distance himself from those rethinkint who ignored or challenged it.
Nor does it mean that knowledge of an objective ontology is impossible.
Evans, In Defense of HistoryLondon, Although quite painful to read! To deny truth by denying perfect knowledge is simply putting the cart before the horse and backwards thinking about the relationship between truth, knowledge, and belief.
Empathy is solely based on ideology? Nov 17, Joshua rated it it was amazing. This introductory text is written for students faced with the question “what is history? Apr 03, Annelise DeVore rated it it was amazing Recommends it for: It rethiinking suggests that historians are not very logical. Bodies That Matter Judith Butler. History, in short, having no object of enquiry, rethinkinng able only to figure forth proposals, is merely a sort of rhetoric a category in which Aristotle placed it over 2, years agoinescapably aesthetic.
But apparently they were not so seen. The Politics krith Regret Jeffrey K. And, finally, that history is, not so much a philosophically-based subject, founded on sound reason, as an activity, based on the everyday language of collective experience Oakeshott.